From the production of abstracts to instances of grammatical metaphors: some research insights to uncover the academic domain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30612/raido.v11i27.5620Palabras clave:
Academic writing. Abstract production. Grammatical metaphors.Resumen
The aim of this paper is twofold: to shed light on the production of paper abstracts from the point of view of their macrostructure, and to discuss the use of nominalizations as instances of grammatical metaphors in this text genre. In order to do so, we will first discuss the principles underlying academic writing (AW), in the attempt to associate them to successful communication in this field. We also showcase a few samples of classroom activities, aimed at illustrating how some of the principles related to abstract writing can be put into practice. With respect to the instances of grammatical metaphors, we call attention to their significance to the academic domain, functioning as topic initiators, and, most importantly, as powerful strategies for successful scientific writing.Descargas
Citas
ALISSON, E. Número de artigos em inglês supera os publicados em português na SciELO. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.ufrgs.br/bibicbs/noticias/numero-de-artigos-em-ingles-supera-os-publicados-em-portugues-na-scielo-brasil. Acesso em 21 set 2016.
BADGER, R.; WHITE, G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, v. 54, p. 153-160, 2000.
BIBER, D. University Language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.
BIBER, B.; CONRAD, S.; CORTES, V. If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, v. 25, n. 3, p. 371-405, 2004.
BYRNES, H. Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In: BYRNES, H; MANCHÓN, R. M. (Ed.). Task-based language learning – insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2014, p. 237-263.
CAMACHO, R. G. The argument structure of deverbal nouns in Brazilian Portuguese [Electronic resource]. Working Paper in Functional Grammar, v. eletrônico, 2007/2103. Disponível em: http://home. hum. uva. nl/fg/working _papers/WPFG_81. Acesso em 15 ago. 2016.
CHAFE, W. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. TANNEN, D. (Ed). Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1982, p p. 35-53.
CUNHA, A.; SANTOS, A. O. ; DIAS, A. M.; LAFER, B.; BUSATTO, G. F. Dificuldades e estratégias de estudantes de pós-graduação da área de ciências da saúde para escrever e publicar em inglês – um estudo qualitativo descritivo. Tempus, actas de saúde colet, v. 8, n. 3, p.145-155, 2014.
DE BONA, C. Propriedades valenciais de nomes deverbais: uma reanálise de dados do projeto NURC com base na linguística textual e no estudo dos anafóricos. Cadernos de Letras da UFF, v. 24, n. 49, p. 219-238, 2014.
DEROEY, K. L. B.; TAVERNIERS, M. A. Corpus-based study of lecture functions. Moderna språk, v. 2, p.1-22, 2011.
DIK, S. C. (Ed.). The structure of the clause. Walter de Gruyter, 1997.
FINARDI, K. R.; ROJO, R. A. O. Globalization, Internationalization and Education: What is the Connection? IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, v. I, n. 1, p. 18-25, 2015.
FLOWERDEW, J. English for Research Publication Purposes. In: PALTRIDGE, B.; STARFIELD, S. (Ed.).The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, 1 ed.. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, p. 301-321.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and education, v. 5, n. 2, p. 93-116, 1993.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar. Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Hodder Arnold Publication, 2004.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K.; MARTIN, J. R. Writing science. Literacy and Discourse Power. London: Flamer Press, 1993.
HINKEL, E. Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
HINKEL, E. What research on second language writing tells us and what it doesn't. In: ______. (Ed.). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Volume 2, London: Routledge, 2011, p. 523-538.
HUANG, J. C. Learning to write for publication in English through genre-based pedagogy: A case in Taiwan. System, v. 45, p. 175-186, 2014.
HYLAND, K. Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, v. 16, p. 148–164, 2007.
HYLAND K. Writing theories and writing Pedagogies. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, v.4, n. 2, p91-110, 2008.
HYLAND, K. Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum, 2009.
HYLAND, K. General and specific EAP. In: HYLAND, K.; SHAW, P. (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. London/New York: Routledge. 2016, p. 17-29.
HYLAND, K.; SHAW, P. Introduction. In: ______. The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. London/New York: Routledge. 2016, p. 1-14.
IGLESIAS, S.; BATISTA, N. A língua inglesa e a formação de mestres e doutores na área da saúde. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE EDUCAÇÃO MÉDICA, v. 34, n. 1, p. 74-81, 2010.
LEE, J.J. Size matters: an exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, v. 28, p.42–57, 2009.
LIARDÉT, C. L. Grammatical metaphor: Distinguishing success. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 22, p. 109-118, 2016.
MANCHÓN, R. M. Language and L2 writing: Learning to write and writing to learn in academic contexts. In: HYLAND, K.; SHAW, P. (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. London/New York: Routledge. 2016, p. 139-151.
MARTIN, P.; REY-ROCHA, J.; BURGESS, S.; MORENO, A. Publishing research in English-language journals: Attitudes, strategies and difficulties of multilingual scholars of medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 16, p. 57-67, 2014.
MOZAHEB, M.A.; SAEIDI, M.; AHANGARI, S. A comparative genre-based study of research
articles’ introductions written by English native/non-native speakers. Calidoscópio, v. 12, n. 3, p. 323-334, set/dez 2014.
MUNGRA. P.; WEBBER, Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments. English for Specific Purposes, v. 29, p. 43–53, 2010.
NICKERSON, C. English for Specific Purposes and English as a Lingua Franca In: PALTRIDGE, B.; STARFIELD, S. (Ed.).The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, First Edition. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 2013, p. 445-460.
ONG, W.J. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen, 1982.
PALTRIDGE, B. Genre and English for Specific Purposes. In: PALTRIDGE, B.; STARFIELD, S. (Ed.).The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, First Edition. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 2013, p. 347-366.
RACELIS, J.; MATSUDA, P. Integrating process and genre into the second language writing classroom: Research into practice. Language Teaching, v. 46, p. 382-393, 2013.
REPPEN, R. A Genre-Based Approach to Content Writing Instruction. In:. RICHARDS, J. C.; RENANDYA, W. A. (Ed.) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 321-327.
SCHLEPPEGRELL, M.J. The Language of Schooling. A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
SWALES, J. M. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
SWALES, J.; FEAK, C. Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2009.
TAVERNIERS, M. Grammatical metaphor in SFL: A historiography of the introduction and initial study of the term. 2003. [Online] Disponível em: http://users.ugent.be/~mtaverni/publications.html. Acesso em 15 ago. 2016.
TAVERNIERS, M. Grammatical metaphor and lexical metaphor: Different perspectives on semantic variation. 2006 [Online] Disponível em: http://users.ugent.be/~mtaverni/publications.html Acesso em 15 ago. 2016.
THOMPSON, G. Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold, 2004.
THOMPSON, G. Introducing functional grammar. 2 ed. Routledge, 2013.
THOMPSON, S. Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signalling of organisation in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 2, p. 5- 20, 2003.
VAN WEIJEN, D. The Language of (future) scientific communication. Research Trends, n. 31, 2012. Available at: https://www.researchtrends.com/issue-31-november-2012/the-language-of-future-scientific-communication/ Accessed on: 18 August, 2016.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Os autores devem aceitar as normas de publicação ao submeterem a revista, bem como, concordam com os seguintes termos:
(a) O Conselho Editorial se reserva ao direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações da Língua portuguesa para se manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
(b) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 3.0 Brasil (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 BR) que permite: Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato e Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material. A CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 BR considera os termos seguintes:
- Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
- NãoComercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
- CompartilhaIgual — Se você remixar, transformar, ou criar a partir do material, tem de distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
