COMPOST BARN CONTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION UNIT IN A SMALL DAIRY PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DOURADINA-MS

Authors

  • Elaine Barbosa Muniz Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Thamiris Wolff Gonçalves Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul/ Graduação https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1460-0165
  • Euclides Reuter Oliveira Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Professor
  • Alzira Salete Menegat Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Professor
  • Andréa Maria de Araújo Gabriel Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Professor
  • Jefferson Rodrigues Gandra Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Professor
  • Eduardo Lucas Terra Peixoto Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Professor
  • Orlando Filipe Costa Marques Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Pós Graduação
  • Hellén Felicidade Durães Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Pós Graduação
  • Janaina Tayna Silva Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Pós Graduação
  • Nathálie Ferreira Neves Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Pós Graduação
  • Brasilino Moreira de Lima Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Graduação
  • Rosilane Teixeira Alves Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Graduação
  • Danielle Sabrina Manganelli Pereira Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados/ Graduação

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30612/realizacao.v8i16.14579

Keywords:

Animal Feeding. Environmental Control. University Extension. Milk Production.

Abstract

Currently, there are several types of rearing system for cattle, such as semi-confinement and confinement pasture. The confinement system is widely used in Brazil in milk production, bringing welfare to the animals, resulting in greater productivity. With this, rural producers have been opting for the Compost Barn system (compost barn). The objective of this work was to present the results obtained with a university extension action based on the Compost Barn confinement, developed by professors and students at the Federal University of Grande Dourados (UFGD). The activity was carried out at the Nossa Senhora do Abadia site, located in the municipality of Douradina – MS, whose main activity is milk production. The partnership for the action occurred when a Compost Barn system was implemented with a capacity for 30 cows, in a covered shed, with a resting area with rice straw, wood shavings or sawdust for the animals, separated by a corridor from troughs and drinking fountains . Initially, each cow's milk was weighed, and those with higher production and those not diagnosed with mastitis were then incorporated into the confinement. Silage mixed with concentrate was fed in the morning and afternoon. The calves were separated from their mothers on the first day and given milk through a bottle. The results of the extension action showed that the implementation of Compost Barn allowed an increase in productivity, as: cows began to produce more milk, the incidence of ticks decreased and there was no dispute for food, as there was availability of a greater area of trough and food in abundance. The occurrence of cases of mastitis was lower, in addition to protection against excessive rain and sun, preventing problems with laminitis. Animal comfort also generated an increase in milk production, in addition to enabling the control of production, consumption and the environment, thus benefiting the rural producer. The action also brought benefits to the extension training of students, improving their knowledge with practical experience. It also made it possible to evaluate a production model to be implemented in other locations, such as the quilombola group and settlers who, due to the pandemic, were unable to visit the unit, but were able to watch the recorded and edited video. The results of this work encouraged courses to be held with other groups assisted with extension actions, being disseminated in meetings with small producers, settlers and quilombolas, multiplying the scope of the action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Thamiris Wolff Gonçalves, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul/ Graduação

Ciência Agrarias

References

ANUÁRIO leite 2020. Brasília, DF. Disponível em: <https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1124722/anuario-leite-2020-leite-de-vacas-felizes>. Acesso em: 03fev. 2021.

MILLEN, D.D; ARRIGONI, M.D.B. Motores de mudança nos sistemas de produção de proteína animal: Mudanças dos sistemas de produção de gado bovino 'tradicional' para 'moderno' no Brasil. Animal Frontiers, v. 3, n. 3, pág. 56-60, 2013.

BARBERG, A.E.;ENDRES, M.I.; JANNI, K.A. Dairy compost barns in Minnesota: a descriptive study. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, v. 23, p. 231-238, 2007.

BRANDÃO, C. R.. O afeto da terra: imaginários, sensibilidades e motivações de relacionamentos com a natureza e o meio ambiente entre agricultores e criadores sitiantes do bairro dos Pretos, nas encostas paulistas da Serra da Mantiqueira em Joanópolis. Campinas: UNICAMP, 1999.

CARVALHO, T. B.; ZEN, S.; TAVARES, E. C. N. Comparação de custo de produção na atividade de pecuária de engorda nos principais países produtores de carne bovina. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ECONOMIA, ADMINISTRAÇÃO E SOCIOLOGIA RURAL, 47, 2009, Porto Alegre. Anais... Porto Alegre: SOBER, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.sober.org.br/palestra/13/356.pdf Acesso em: 30 abr. 2021.

DEBLITZ, C. Beef and Sheep Report: understanding agriculture worldwide. Agri benchmark. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.agribenchmark.de/beef-and-sheep/ publications-and-projects/beef-and-sheep-report.html Acesso em: 30 abr. 2021.

FERRAZ, J. B. S.; FELÍCIO, P. E. de. Production systems - An example from Brazil. Meat Science, v. 84, n. 2, p. 238-243, 2010.

FRANCO, G. A. M. Leite a pasto e confinamento de gado leiteiro: o que os técnicos nunca dizem Leite a pasto e confinamento de gado leiteiro: o que os técnicos nunca dizem. 2009. Disponível em:http//www.milkpoint.com.br/artigos/espaco-aberto/leite-apasto-e-confinamento-de-gado-leiteiro-o-que-os-tecnicos-nunca-dizem-57033n.aspx Acesso em: 30 abr. 2021.

MAIA, N. F; Sistema de compost barn na produção leiteira visando o bem-estar animal. 2018. Disponível em: http://newtonfreiremaia.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/tcc2018_sistemadecompostbarn.pdf. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2021.

MENEGAT, A. S.; CENCI, G. R.. Entrevista com Professor Euclides Reuter de Oliveira. REALIZAÇÃO - REVISTA ONLINE DE EXTENSÃO DA UFGD, v. 6, p. 149-161, 2019.

NOVAES, L. P. Confinamento para bovinos Leiteiros. In: PEIXOTO et. al. Bovino cultura Leiteira; Fundamentos da Exploração Racional.Piracicaba: FEALQ. 171 – 297, 1993.

OLINGER, G. Extensão Rural: Verdades e Novidades. Florianópolis: EPAGRI, 1998.

OLIVEIRA, E. R.;MUNIZ, E.B.; SOARES, J.P.G; FARIAS,M.F. L.; GANDRA, J. R.; GABRIEL, A.M. A.; MALAQUIAS, J. V.; PEREIRA, T. L..Environmental impacts of the conversion to organic honey production in family units of small farmers in Brazil.Organic Agriculture, p. 1-11, 2019.

PEREIRA, E. S., PIMENTEL, P. G., QUEIROZ, A. C.;MIZUBUTI, I. Y. Novilhas leiteiras. Graphiti Gráfica e Editora Ltda, Fortaleza, Ceará. 2010.

REDAÇÃO SAFRAES. Espirito Santo.Disponível em: <https://www.safraes.com.br/pecuaria-leiteira/desvendando-compost-barn>. Acesso em: 03fev. 2021.

REZELMAN, J. A. History of Barns, The crooked lake review. 1993

SIMON, A. A. A Extensão Rural e o Novo Paradigma. Florianópolis: EPAGRI, 1996.

Published

2021-12-16

How to Cite

Muniz, E. B., Gonçalves, T. W., Oliveira, E. R., Menegat, A. S., Gabriel, A. M. de A., Gandra, J. R., … Pereira, D. S. M. (2021). COMPOST BARN CONTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION UNIT IN A SMALL DAIRY PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DOURADINA-MS. RealizAção, 8(16), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.30612/realizacao.v8i16.14579

Issue

Section

Articles