O papel das incubadoras sociais para a promoção da educação popular: uma revisão sistemática de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30612/re-ufgd.v6i12.9266Palavras-chave:
Incubadora social, Educação popular, Revisão sistemática, Economia solidáriaResumo
As incubadoras tecnológicas de empreendimentos sociais e solidários são espaços de socialização dos conhecimentos produzidos entre o ensino-pesquisa-extensão nas universidades brasileiras. Estas incubadoras tem como princípio a melhoria da qualidade de vida de pessoas em situação de vulnerabilidade social. O objetivo deste artigo é compreender como as incubadoras sociais contribuem para as qualificações transformadoras de grupos sociais – como a educação popular ou a economia solidária. O estudo teve como metodologia a abordagem de revisão sistemática, descritiva, exploratória e qualitativa, a partir de uma revisão bibliográfica na base de dados Scielo e Emerald. Foram coletados 48 artigos. Destaca-se nos resultados que não houve artigos com interfaces nas duas temáticas (incubadoras sociais e educação popular). Entretanto como discussões, a economia solidária é explicitamente o objeto fundamental de um processo educativo, pautado pela educação popular. As interconexões das pessoas no ambiente das incubadoras sociais vêm desvendando noções práticas de desenvolvimento político-social regional.Downloads
Referências
Bàculo, L. (2006). Tackling informal employment: the case of southern Italy. International Journal of Manpower, 27(6), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610690482
Bourdieu, P; Passeron, J. C. A reprodução. Elementos para uma teoria do sistema de ensino. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1975.
Brandão, Carlos (1995). O que é educação?. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
Cao, Y., Zhao, L., & Chen, R. (2009). Institutional structure and incentives of technology transfer: Some new evidence from Chinese universities. Journal of Technology Management in China, 4(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770910942843
Collins, L., Hannon, P. D., & Smith, A. (2004). Enacting entrepreneurial intent: the gaps between student needs and higher education capability. Education + Training, 46(8/9), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410569579
Cross, J. (2000). Street vendors, and postmodernity: conflict and compromise in the global economy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(1/2), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2016-0047
Cruz, Antonio; Guerra, Janaína da Silva. In: Herbert, Sérgio et al. Participação e práticas educativas - a construção coletiva do conhecimento. São Leopoldo: Oikós, 2009. pp. 90-105.
Culti, M. N. (2006). O desafio do processo educativo na prática de incubação de empreendimentos econômicos solidários. Retrieved from http://www.bdae.org.br/dspace/handle/123456789/349
Drew, S. a. W. (2011). Strategic roles of centers in business school development. Journal of Management Development, 30(9), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111164303
Durkheim, É.. Definição de Educação. In: Educação e Sociologia. 3 ed. Trad Lourenço Filho. São Paulo: Melhoramentos, 1952.
Emslie, L., & Bent, R. (2007). Public sector business support providers: marketing business support to the ethnic business sector. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(5), 460–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500710774941
Freeman, I., & Thomas, M. (2005). Consumerism in education: A comparison between Canada and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540510582444
Guerra, A. C. J. da S. (2009). Educação popular e economia solidária nas incubadoras universitárias de cooperativas populares – práticas dialógicas mediadas pelo trabalho, 90–105.
Helms, M. M., Rodríguez, M. a., Ríos, L. D. L., & Hargrave, W. (Bill). (2011). Entrepreneurial potential in Argentina: a SWOT analysis. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 21(3), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421111134859
Ho Mok, K. (2008). Singapore’s global education hub ambitions. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810895444
Iacobucci, D., & Micozzi, A. (2012). Entrepreneurship education in Italian universities: trend, situation and opportunities. Education + Training, 54(8/9), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211274828
Iakovleva, T., Solesvik, M., & Trifilova, A. (2013). Financial availability and government support for women entrepreneurs in transitional economies. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(2), 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001311326752
IADH. (2011). Avaliação Do Programa Nacional de Incubadoras Tecnológicas de Cooperativas e Empreendimentos Solidários – PRONINC. Recife: Secretaria Nacional de Economia. Disponível em: http://acesso.mte.gov.br/data/files/8A7C812D3C3A6BBF013CB4C1940C0E82/Avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20do%20PRONIN%202011%20_%20IADH.pdf. Acesso em: 08 de setembro de 2017.
Jackson, P., Gharavi, H., & Klobas, J. (2006). Technologies of the self: Virtual work and the inner panopticon. Information Technology and People, 19(3), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840610689831
Jarman, J., & Singh Chopra, P. (2008). Business services and the knowledge economy in Malaysia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28(5/6), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330810881240
Jiao, H. (2011). A conceptual model for social entrepreneurship directed toward social impact on society. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611111156600
Jones, P., Jones, A., Packham, G., & Miller, C. (2008). Student attitudes towards enterprise education in Poland: a positive impact. Education + Training, 50(7), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810909054
Langkamp Bolton, D., & Lane, M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: development of a measurement instrument. Education + Training, 54(2/3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210314
Li, X. (2006). Library as incubating space for innovations: practices, trends and skill sets. Library Management, 27(6/7), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120610702369
Lili, Z. (2011). Comparative study of China and USA’s colleges entrepreneurship education from an international perspective. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561391111166966
Lounsbury, M. (1998). Collective entrepreneurship: the mobilization of college and university recycling coordinators. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819810369572
Luke, B. (2008). Financial returns from new public management: a New Zealand perspective. Pacific Accounting Review, 20(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580810872834
Luke, B., Kearins, K., & Verreynne, M. (2011). The risks and returns of new public management: political business. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(4), 325–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111133489
Macleod, G., Mcfarlane, B., & Davis, C. H. (1997). regions in Canada and Mexico.
Marshall, Alfred (1987). Princípios de economia: volume 1. São Paulo: Nova Cultural.
Marx, Karl (1985). O capital. São Paulo: Nova Cultural
Matlay, H. (2011). The influence of stakeholders on developing enterprising graduates in UK HEIs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551111114923
Mills, C. E. (2012). Navigating the interface between design education and fashion business start-up. Education + Training, 54(8), 761–777. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211274873
Minard, C. S. L. (2009). Valuing entrepreneurship in the informal economy in Senegal. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610911004304
Modderman, E., Gorter, C., Dalhuisen, J., & Nijkamp, P. (2007). Labour manoeuvrability and economic performance: A test on township village enterprises in China. International Journal of Social Economics, 34(4), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290710734190
Newbery, R., & Bosworth, G. (2010). Home-based business sectors in the rural economy. Society and Business Review, 5(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465681011055596
Niu, D., Jiang, D., & Li, F. (2010). Higher education for sustainable development in China. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011031874
Peltier, J. W., & Scovotti, C. (2010). Enhancing entrepreneurial marketing education: the student perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(4), 514–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011088705
Piperopoulos, P. (2012). Could higher education programmes, culture and structure stifle the entrepreneurial intentions of students? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(3), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001211250162
Quinn, B., & Wennes, G. (2008). Mind‐sets, mirrors and mid‐career education. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810880232
Rabayah, K. S., & Sartawi, B. (2008). Enhancing the labour market prospects of ICT students in a developing country. Education and Training, 50(3), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810874017
Roper, J., & Cheney, G. (2005). The meanings of social entrepreneurship today. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510604733
Sagie, A., & Weisberg, J. (2001). The transformation in human resource management in Israel. International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720110398275
Samwel Mwasalwiba, E. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education + Training (Vol. 52). https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011017663
Schütz, Rosalvo. Economia Popular Solidária: novos desafios para a educação popular. In: Vários Autores; Série Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil. (Org.). Desafio da economia solidária. São Paulo: Editora e Livraria Instituto Paulo Freire, 2008, v. 04, p. 19-52.
Shenkin, M., & Coulson, A. B. (2007). Accountability through activism: learning from Bourdieu. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710741037
Shurville, S., Browne, T., Whitaker, M., Shurville, S., & Browne, T. (2009). Accommodating the newfound strategic importance of educational technologists within higher education: A critical literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(3), 201–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740910967384
Stanworth, J., & Stanworth, C. (1990). Small Firms Policy and its Regional Implications in Britain. International Journal of Manpower, 11(6), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729010111085
Sullivan, R. S. (2011). Business schools and the innovation conundrum. Journal of Management Development, 30(5), 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111133000
Thomas, H. (2007). An analysis of the environment and competitive dynamics of management education. Journal of Management Development, 26(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710720040
Thompson, J. L. (1999). The world of the entrepreneur – a new perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 11(6), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665629910284990
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Academy of Management, 14, 207–222.
Turker, D., & Sonmez Selcuk, S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590910939049
Williams, C. C. (2011). Entrepreneurship, the informal economy and rural communities. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 5(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506201111131578
Williams, C. C., & Windebank, J. (2006). Harnessing the hidden enterprise culture of advanced economies. International Journal of Manpower, 27(6), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610690473
Wilson, L. a. (2004). What a difference a decade makes: transformation in academic library instruction. Reference Services Review, 32(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320410569680
Xu, L. (2009). Business incubation in China. Management Research Review, 33(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171011011599
Zhou, C. (2008). Emergence of the entrepreneurial university in evolution of the triple helix The case of Northeastern University in China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770810851539
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2019 Ijean Gomes Riedo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista aceitam as normas de publicação, bem como, concordam com os seguintes termos:
(a) O Conselho Editorial se reserva ao direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações da Língua portuguesa para se manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
(b) Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional que permite: Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato e Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material. A Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional considera os termos seguintes:
- Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
- NãoComercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
- CompartilhaIgual — Se você remixar, transformar, ou criar a partir do material, tem de distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
