AGAINST UNILATERALISM: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL FOOD ASSISTANCE IN THE TRUMP GOVERNMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v10i19.12458

Keywords:

International Food Assistance, United States, Donald Trump.

Abstract

The United States has been characterized as the main donor of food assistance to the world since the 1950s, when international food donation programs were created. Upon reaching the White House, Donald Trump proposed to extinguish international food assistance programs as part of his foreign policy agenda of disengagement from international organizations and multilateralism. Despite this, what was perceived of his government was a continuation of this type of foreign aid. What factors contributed to the continuity of the United States' international food assistance? From an analysis of the Trump administration's foreign policy, the article points to three main reasons: (a) the contrary position of congressmen and members of the government to the foreign aid cuts proposed by the Trump administration's “American hawks”; (b) the strategic choice of Republican David Beasley as director-general of the World Food Program; and (c) lobbying by the iron triangle (agricultural producers and processors, shipping companies and distribution NGOs). The article helps to understand the influence that actors other than the head of state, and mediated by institutions (national or international), can have on American foreign policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Atos Dias, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Doutorando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (PPGCP/UFPE). Mestre pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão Pública e Cooperação Internacional da Universidade Federal da Paraíba (PGPCI/UFPB). Bacharel em Relações Internacionais pela UFPB. Membro do Grupo de Pesquisa sobre Fome e Relações Internacionais (FomeRI/UFPB). Atua principalmente nos seguintes temas: Economia Política Internacional, Cooperação Internacional e Governança Global. Tem interesse específico em questões agrárias e de segurança alimentar nas Relações Internacionais.

Thiago Lima, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

Coordenador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão Pública e Cooperação Internacional da UFPB. Professor do Departamento de Relações Internacionais. Doutor em Ciência Política pela Unicamp, Mestre em Relações Internacionais pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação San Tiago Dantas (UNESP, UNICAMP, PUC-SP), Graduado em Relações Internacionais pelo Unibero. Atua como pesquisador do Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia para Estudos sobre os Estados Unidos (INCT-INEU). Coordenador do Grupo de Pesquisa sobre Fome e Relações Internacionais (FomeRI) da UFPB. Tem interesse nas áreas de Economia Política Internacional, Política Internacional e Política Externa, com foco no Brasil e nos Estados Unidos. Interessa-se, especificamente, por questões agrícolas e de segurança alimentar nas Relações Internacionais.

References

AMO (American Maritime Officers). Administration seeks to eliminate Food for Peace Title II, roll back MSP funding in FY 2018 budget. 2017. Disponível em:<

http://www.amo-union.org/News.aspx?code=201706-02> Acessado em: 28 fev. 2020.

BOYER, Dave. Nancy Pelosi calls Donald Trump foreign aid cuts illegal. Washington Times, 2019. Disponível em:< https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/nancy-pelosi-calls-donald-trump-foreign-aid-cuts-i/>. Acessado em: 05 jul. 2021.

CASEY, Alyssa R.; MORGENSTERN, Emily M. International Food Assistance: FY2020 Appropriations. Congressional Research Service. 2020. Disponível em:<https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20200304_R46255_088b7172f6fa199e02d6cf58b5396d22ea3034d0.pdf> Acessado em: 01 mai. 2020.

CLAPP, Jenifer. Hunger in the Balance: the new politics of international food aid. Londres: Cornell University Press, 2012.

DIAS, Atos. O impacto da política de ajuda alimentar internacional dos Estados Unidos na cooperação multilateral do Programa Mundial de Alimentos. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 2016.

DIVEN, Polly. A Coincidence of Interests: the hyperpluralism of U.S. Food Aid Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, v. 2, n. 4, p. 361-384, 2006.

DONNAN, Shawn; WINGROVE, Josh; MOHSIN, Saleha. U.S. and China Sign Phase One of Trade Deal. Bloomberg, 2020. Disponível em:<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-15/u-s-china-sign-phase-one-of-trade-deal-trump-calls-remarkable> Acessado em: 28 abr. 2020.

DURISIN, Megan. President Trump Says U.S. Will Buy American Farmers’ Crops to Offset China Trade Losses. Time, 2019. Disponível em:<https://time.com/5587231/trump-us-crops-china-trade-war/> Acessado em: 28 abr. 2020.

EISENHOWER, Dwight D. Statement by the President Upon Signing Bill Amending the Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act. The American Presidency Project. 1955. Disponível em:< https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-the-president-upon-signing-bill-amending-the-agricultural-trade-development-and>. Acessado em: 05 jul. 2020.

FENG, Zhaoyin. EUA e China assinam acordo após 2 anos de guerra comercial: o que mudou ao longo da disputa? BBC, 2020. Disponível em:<https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-51119805> Acessado em: 27 abr. 2020.

FRANCIS, Samuel. The Paleo Persuasion. The American Conservative. 2002. Disponível em:<https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-paleo-persuasion/> Acessado em: 23 abr. 2020.

FUKUYAMA, Francis. O fim da história e o último homem. São Paulo: Rocco, 1992.

LAMBERS, William. Six-five years later, Ike’s Food for Peace is our best hope. TCPALM, 2019. Disponível em:< https://www.tcpalm.com/story/opinion/contributors/2019/07/08/sixty-five-years-later-ikes-food-peace-our-best-hope/1655323001/> Acessado em: 20 jan. 2020.

LANDLER, Mark; TANKERSLEY, Jim. Trump Hits China with Stiff Trade Measures. New York Times, 2018. Disponível em:<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/us/politics/trump-will-hit-china-with-trade-measures-as-white-house-exempts-allies-from-tariffs.html> Acessado em: 26 abr. 2020.

LEIMBACH, Dulcie. Cowboys may be running the World Food Program, but Donations Keep Coming. PassBlue, 2019. Disponível em:< https://www.passblue.com/2019/10/27/cowboys-may-be-running-the-world-food-program-but-donations-keep-coming/> Acessado em: 01 dez. 2019.

LIMA, Thiago; DIAS, Atos. Ajuda alimentar internacional dos EUA: política externa, interesses econômicos e assistência humanitária. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas e Internacionais, v. 1, n. 1, p. 189-211, 2016.

LYNCH, Colum. U.N to put Trump Appointee at Head of World Food Programme to help stave off U.S. cuts. Foreign Policy, 2017. Disponível em:<https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/24/u-n-to-put-trump-appointee-at-head-of-world-food-program-to-help-stave-off-cuts/> Acessado em: 02 jan. 2020.

MARIANO, Karina L. P.; MATTOS, Angelo R.; SUGAHARA, Daniela R. Do NAFTA ao USMCA: Trump e os interesses nacionais. Perspectivas, v. 54, p. 235-260, jul./dez. 2019.

MENDONÇA, Filipe; THOMAZ, Lais Forti; LIMA, Thiago; VIGEVANI, Tullo. "AMERICA FIRST BUT NOT ALONE”: uma (nem tão) nova política comercial dos Estados Unidos com Donald Trump. Revista Tempo Do Mundo, vol. 5, n. 1, p. 107-141, 2019.

MENEZES, Henrique Z., CARVALHO, Pedro H. M., LEITE, Alexandre C. C. Will Trump make China great again? A saída dos Estados Unidos do TPP e as respostas chinesas. In BOJIKIAN, Neusa M., MENEZES, Henrique Z. A economia política do governo Trump. Curitiba: Appris, 2021.

MILNER, Helen V. Interest, institutions and information. Domestic politics and

international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.

MORELLO, Carol. State Department’s 28 percent cut hit foreign aid, U.N. and climate change. Washington Post, 2017. Disponível em:<

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/state-departments-28-percent-cuts-hit-foreign-aid-un-and-climate-change/2017/03/15/294d7ab8-0996-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html> Acessado em: 12 jan. 2020.

MORGENSTERN, Emily M. International Food Assistance: Food for Peace Nonemergency Programs. Congressional Research Service. 2019. Disponível em:<https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45879.pdf> Acessado em: 01 mai. 2020.

PATTON, Dominique; CHEN, Yawen. China to waive tariffs on some U.S. soybeans, pork in goodwill gesture. Reuters, 2019. Disponível em:<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-tariffs/china-to-waive-tariffs-on-some-u-s-soybeans-pork-idUSKBN1YA0FW> Acessado em: 27 abr. 2020.

PECEQUILO, Cristina S. Os Estados Unidos de H. Bush a Donald J. Trump (1989/2017): Dinâmicas políticas de consenso e polarização. Revista Esboços v. 24, n. 38, p. 339-359, 2017.

POGGIO, Carlos Gustavo. Qual conservadorismo? Da América de Trump ao Brasil de Bolsonaro. 2018. Disponível em:<https://estadodaarte.estadao.com.br/conservadorismos-da-america-de-trump-ao-brasil-de-bolsonaro/> Acessado em: 12 dez. 2019.

PORTILLO, Luis. ¿Alimentos para la Paz? La “ayuda” de Estados Unidos. Madrid: Iepala Editorial, 1987.

QUINN, B. Will Trump honour pledge to stop sending aid to countries that hate us? The Guardian, 2016. Disponível em:<

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/nov/13/will-trump-presidency-honour-pledge-stop-sending-foreign-aid-to-countries-that-hate-us-usaid> Acessado em: 25 jan. 2020.

RAPPEPORT, Alan. U.S. Rolls Out More Farm Aid as Soy Growers Urge Trade Cease-Fire. New York Times, 2019. Disponível em:<https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/us/politics/farm-aid-trade-wars.html> Acessado em: 28 abr. 2020.

STOKES, Doug. Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order. International Affairs, v. 94, n. 1, p. 133-150, 2018.

TRUMP, Donald J. Talks with China continue in a very congenial manner… 2019. Twitter: @realDonaldTrump. Disponível em:<https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1126815126584266753> Acessado em: 28 abr. 2020.

UNITED NATIONS (UN). UN Comtrade Database. 2021. Disponível em:<https://comtrade.un.org/data/> Acessado em: 23 jun. 2021.

U.S. WHEAT ASSOCIATES. An Appeal to Protect International Food Assistance. 2018. Disponível em:< https://www.uswheat.org/wheatletter/an-appeal-to-protect-international-food-assistance/> Acessado em: 28 jan. 2020.

USA SENATE. State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. 2019. Disponível em:<

https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/subcommittees/state-foreign-operations-and-related-programs> Acessado em: 29 jan. 2020.

USAID (United States Agency for International Development). USAID Data Services. 2021. Disponível em:<https://explorer.usaid.gov/> Acessado em: 10 jun. 2021.

USAID (United States Agency for International Development). U.S. Agency for International Development International Food Assistance Report: Fiscal Year 2018. 2019. Disponível em:<https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1869/USAIDInternationalFood_AssistanceReportFY2018.pdf> Acessado em: 29 abr. 2020.

USAID (United States Agency for International Development). U.S. International Food Assistance Report: Fiscal Year 2017. 2018. Disponível em:<https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1867/FY_2017_IFAR.pdf> Acessado em: 29 abr. 2020.

USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). Ag and Foods Sectors and the Economy. 2017. Disponível em:<https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/ag-and-food-sectors-and-the-economy/> Acessado em: 28 abr. 2020.

VIGEVANI, Tullo. MENDONÇA, Filipe, LIMA, Thiago. Poder e Comércio: a política comercial dos Estados Unidos. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2018.

WADHAMS, Nick; FABIAN, Jordan. Trump to scale back planned foreign aid cuts after pompeo plea. Bloomberg, 2019. Disponível em:<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-20/trump-to-scale-back-planned-foreign-aid-cuts-after-pompeo-plea> Acessado em: 10 jan. 2020.

WERFT, Meghan. The Trumps administration wants to cut food aid amid a famine - but congress can stop it. Global Citizen, 2017. Disponível em:< https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/congress-listens-to-the-case-for-keeping-us-food-a/> Acessado em: 15 dez. 2019.

WFP (World Food Programme). Contributions by Year. 2021. Disponível em:<https://www.wfp.org/funding> Acessado em: 23 jun. 2021.

WHITE HOUSE. National Security Strategy. 2017. Disponível em:<https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf> Acessado em: 30 abr. 2020.

WOLTERMANN, Chris. What is Paleoconservatism? Telos, n. 97, p. 9-20, 1993.

WONG, Edward; KARNI, Annie; COCHRANE, Emily. Trump Administration Drops Proposal to Cut Foreign Aid After Intense Debate. New York Times, 2019. Disponível em:<https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/22/us/politics/trump-foreign-aid.html> Acessado em: 12 dez. 2019.

ZHONG, Raymond. China Strikes Back at Trump’s Tariffs, but Its Consumers Worry. New York Times, 2018. Disponível em:<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/06/business/china-trump-trade-war-tariffs.html> Acessado em: 26 abr. 2020

Published

2021-10-15

How to Cite

Dias, A., & Lima, T. (2021). AGAINST UNILATERALISM: UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL FOOD ASSISTANCE IN THE TRUMP GOVERNMENT. Monções: UFGD Journal of International Relations, 10(19), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v10i19.12458

Issue

Section

Paper Special Issue - International Cooperation: contemporary challenges