The cucapáh indigenous group struggle against green colonialism: self-determination & fishing rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30612/videre.v15i32.17179

Keywords:

Mexico, Cucapáh, Self-determination, Indigenous rights, Green colonialism

Abstract

The Cucapáh Indigenous group has lived for 1000 years on the Colorado River Delta area. In Baja California, México, several Cucapáh families are fishermen and women. In this paper I argue two main points: 1 The Cucapáh currently suffer from processes of green colonialism, typical of the dominant neocolonial capitalist system. 2 The struggle for their fishing rights in the Colorado river is their struggle for Indigenous self-determination, which is also intertwined with their struggle for the respect of their communal land possession. This research bases in a qualitative methodology using a grounded theory, composed of in-depth interviews, and participant observation, in the Cucapáh communities of El Mayor Cucapáh, Ejido el Indiviso, and Ejido Cucapáh Mestizo, in Baja California, México, as well as archival research in Mexicali, Baja California, México.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fernando David Márquez Duarte, University of California Riverside

PhD candidate in Political Science at University of California Riverside. MA degree in Regional Development from COLEF. BA degree in International Relations from UABC

References

ANGLÉS HERNÁNDEZ, M. La garantía del derecho de acceso, uso y disfrute preferente de los indígenas a los recursos naturales. Caso Cucapá”. Primera memoria del seminario itinerante internacional. La cuestión agraria: tierras, territorios, medio ambiente, recursos naturales, migrantes, derechos sociales y colectivos de los pueblos. Anais... Em: SEMINARIO: LA CUESTIÓN AGRARIA: TIERRAS, TERRITORIOS, MEDIO AMBIENTE. México: UNAM, 2011.

BLEE, K. M. Evidence, empathy, and ethics: Lessons from oral histories of the Klan. The Journal of American History, v. 80, n. 2, p. 596–606, 1993.

BONADA CHAVARRÍA, A. Desertificación y resistencia: Los orígenes histórico-ambientales de las cooperativas pesqueras cucapá (1937-2015). Anuario del Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos SA Segreti, v. 1, n. 15, p. 19–32, 2015.

BONADA CHAVARRÍA, A. La memoria biocultural del pueblo Cucapá de Baja California. Un análisis histórico ambiental. Master’s degree thesis—Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara, 2016.

CARDONA, A. Entrevista con Mto. Arturo Cardona. , 2022.

CHARMAZ, K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. [s.l.] sage, 2006.

COMISIÓN ECONÓMICA PARA AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE (CEPAL)/FONDO PARA EL DESARROLLO DE LOS; PUEBLOS INDÍGENAS DE AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE (FILAC). Los pueblos indígenas de América Latina – Abya Yala y la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible: Documentos de proyectos. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL, 2020.

CORNTASSEL, J.; WOONS, M. Indigenous perspectives. Em: MCGLINCHEY, S. (Ed.). Internatinal Relations Theoy. E-IR Foundations. [s.l.] E-International Relations, 2017. p. 131–137.

COULTHARD, G. S. Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. 1st. ed. Minneapolis, USA: U of Minnesota Press, 2014.

CRESWELL, J. W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd. ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications, 2007.

EFE. Lenguas indígenas resisten en México ante “alto riesgo” y amenaza de perderse. Agencia EFE, 21 fev. 2020.

FANON, F. Los condenados de la tierra. 1. ed. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica México, 1963.

FOX, C. A. et al. “The river is us; the river is in our veins”: re-defining river restoration in three Indigenous communities. Sustainability Science, v. 12, n. 4, p. 521–533, 2017.

GAMBOA, C.; VALDÉS, S. LOS USOS Y COSTUMBRES DE PUEBLOS INDIGENAS: Derecho Comparado a Nivel Estatal. Ciudad de México: Cámara de Diputados, mar. 2018. Disponível em: <http://www.diputados.gob.mx/sedia/sia/spi/SAPI-ISS-04-18.pdf>.

GARDUÑO, E. Yumanos. [s.l.] Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas, 2015.

GÓMEZ ESTRADA, J. A. Los usos del Río Colorado y la subsistencia de los indígenas Cucapá en el valle de Mexicali. 1852-1944. Estudios Fronterizos, v. 1, n. 36, p. 215–238, 1995.

GONZÁLEZ CASANOVA, P. Colonialismo interno (una redefinición). Em: La teoría marxista hoy. Problemas y perspectivas. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2006. p. 409–434.

HALE, C. R. Neoliberal multiculturalism: the remaking of cultural rights and racial dominance in Central America. PoLAR, v. 28, n. 1, p. 10–28, 2005.

HARVEY, D. A brief history of neoliberalism. United States: Oxford University Press, 2007.

HURTADO, H. Entrevista con Hilda Hurtado. , 2022a.

HURTADO, I. Entrevista con Inés Hurtado. , 2022b.

HURTADO, R. Entrevista con Rita Hurtado. , 2022c.

KAWULICH, B. B. Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research. Anais...2005.

LÓPEZ BÁRCENAS, F. Legislación y derechos indígenas en México. [s.l.] Centro de Orientación y Asesoría a Pueblos Indígenas, 2002. v. 3

LÓPEZ BÁRCENAS, F. Pueblos indígenas y megaproyectos en México: las nuevas rutas del despojo. Em: Patrimonio biocultural, saberes y derechos de los pueblos originarios. [s.l.] CLACSO, 2012. p. 123–140.

MUEHLMANN, S. Von Humboldt’s parrot and the countdown of last speakers in the Colorado Delta. Language & Communication, v. 32, n. 2, p. 160–168, 2012.

NAVARRO SMITH, A. Pescadores cucapá contemporáneos: investigación y video colaborativo en un escenario de conflicto. Horizontes Antropológicos, v. 19, n. 1, p. 205–240, 2013.

NAVARRO SMITH, A.; BRAVO ESPINOSA, Y.; LÓPEZ SAGÁSTEGUI, C. Derechos colectivos y consulta previa: territorio cucapá y recursos pesqueros en Baja California, México. Revista colombiana de sociología, v. 37, n. 2, p. 43–64, 2014.

NORMANN, S. Green colonialism in the Nordic context: Exploring Southern Saami representations of wind energy development. Journal of Community Psychology, v. 49, n. 1, p. 77–94, 2021.

O’SULLIVAN, D. Māori Self-determination and a Liberal Theory of Indigeneity. Em: WOONS, M. (Ed.). Restoring indigenous self determination. E-IR Foundations. 2nd. ed. [s.l.] E-International Relations, 2015. p. 57–64.

PACHIRAT, T. Every twelve seconds. Em: Every Twelve Seconds. [s.l.] Yale University Press, 2011.

QUIJANO, A. Modernity, identity, and utopia in Latin America. boundary 2, v. 20, n. 3, p. 140–155, 1993.

QUIJANO, A. Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, v. 15, n. 2, p. 215–232, 2000.

QUIJANO, A. Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. Contextualizaciones Latinoamericanas, n. 5, 2015.

RAY, L. “Beading Becomes a Part of Your Life” Transforming the Academy Through the Use of Beading as a Method of Inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, v. 9, n. 3, p. 363–378, 2016.

RIVERA DE LA TORRE, R. Entrevista con Lic. Ricardo Rivera de la Torre. , jan. 2023.

SÁNCHEZ OGÁS, Y. A la orilla del Río Colorado. Mexicali, B.C., México: Yolanda Sánchez Ogás, 2001.

SCHREYER, C. et al. Learning to talk to the land: Online stewardship in Taku River Tlingit territory. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, v. 3, n. 3, p. 106–133, 2014.

SIMPSON, L. B. As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. Minneapolis, USA: U of Minnesota Press, 2017.

SUBOTIĆ, J. Ethics of archival research on political violence. Journal of Peace Research, v. 58, n. 3, p. 342–354, 2021.

SVAMPA, M. Las fronteras del neoextractivismo en América Latina: conflictos socioambientales, giro ecoterritorial y nuevas dependencias. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara/CALAS, 2019.

TIMMERMANS, S.; TAVORY, I. Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological theory, v. 30, n. 3, p. 167–186, 2012.

TUHIWAI SMITH, L. A descolonizar las metodologías. Tradução: Kathryn Lehman. 1. ed. Chile: LOM Ediciones, 2016.

VALENZUELA DE MACLIS, M. Entrevista con Margarita Valenzuela de Maclis. , 2022.

WALSH, C. Interculturalidad y colonialidad del poder. Un pensamiento y posicionamiento “otro” desde la diferencia colonial. Em: El giro decolonial. Reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global. Encuentros. [s.l.] Siglo del Hombre Editores, 2007. p. 47–62.

WALSH, C. Interculturalidad, plurinacionalidad y decolonialidad: las insurgencias político-epistémicas de refundar el Estado. Tabula rasa, n. 9, p. 131–152, 2008.

WALSH, C. Pedagogías decoloniales: prácticas insurgentes de resistir,(re) existir y (re) vivir. [s.l.] Abya Yala, 2013.

WILDCAT, M. et al. Learning from the land: Indigenous land based pedagogy and decolonization. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, v. 3, n. 3, 2014.

WILSON, S. Research is ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Winnipeg, Canada: Fernwood Publishing, 2008.

YANOW, D. Wherefore interpretive? An introduction. Em: SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P.; YANOW, D. (Eds.). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2014. p. xiii–xxxi.

YANOW, D.; SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P. Encountering your IRB 2.0: what political scientists need to know. PS: Political Science & Politics, v. 49, n. 2, p. 277–286, 2016.

Published

2023-10-24

How to Cite

Duarte, F. D. M. (2023). The cucapáh indigenous group struggle against green colonialism: self-determination & fishing rights. Revista Videre, 15(32), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.30612/videre.v15i32.17179

Issue

Section

Scientific Articles