International governance of marine socioecological systems (SES): a case study of South America

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v9i18.10485

Keywords:

marine governance, multilateral agreements, regional agreements

Abstract

How does marine governance occur in South America? In order to answer this question, we envision the marine environment based on a framework on socioecological systems and identify the main rules, actors and interactions. Our exploratory empirical study first mapped all of the global and regional multilateral agreements issue related since 1931. Second, we compared the main global agreements to the regional ones, to characterize the institutional dynamics around the marine environment in South America. Three results stand out. Eighty-two international agreements were identified, of which only ten are related solely to the countries of the region. Also, we found that pollution and biodiversity are the most recurrent themes among the interactions and rules that have been established. Finally, we conclude that the institutional configuration related to the marine environment in South America is a scenario of overlapping regimes, which may lead to problems such as lack of coordination in relation to the use of this environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elia Elisa Cia Alves, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Professora de Relações Internacionais no Departamento de Ciência Política da UFPE.

Rodrigo Barros De Albuquerque, Universidade Federal de Sergipe

Professor de Relações Internacionais na UFS.

Andrea Quirino Steiner, Departamento de Ciência Política, UFPE

Professora de Relações Internacionais no Departamento de Ciência Política, UFPE.

References

ALLISON, Edward H. Big laws, small catches: global ocean governance and the fisheries crisis. Journal of International Development, v. 13, n. 7, p. 933-950, 2001.

BARNABÉ, Israel Roberto. Argentina, Brasil e Venezuela: hegemonia compartilhada na integração sul-americana? Espacio Aberto, v. 23, n. 4, p. 587-595, 2014.

BIGAGLI, Emanuele. The EU legal framework for the management of marine complex social–ecological systems. Marine Policy, v. 54, p. 44-51, 2015.

______. The international legal framework for the management of the global oceans social-ecological system. Marine Policy, v. 68, p. 155-164, 2016.

BRANDON, Katrina; FONSECA, Gustavo A. B.; RYLANDS, Anthony B.; SILVA, José Maria C. Conservação Brasileira: Desafios e Oportunidades. Megadiversidade, v. 1, p. 7-13, 2005.

CARVALHO, Patrícia Nasser de; GONÇALVES, Fernanda Cristino Nanci Izidro. O Brasil como potência regional: uma análise da sua liderança na América do Sul no início do século XXI. Carta Internacional, v. 11, n. 3, p. 222-248, 2016.

DAVENPORT, John; DAVENPORT, Julia L. The impact of tourism and personal leisure transport on coastal environments: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, v. 67, n. 1, p. 280-292, 2006.

FEELY, Richard A. et al. Impact of anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 system in the oceans. Science, v. 305, n. 5682, p. 362-366, 2004.

GÓMEZ-MERA, Laura. International Regime Complexity and Regional Governance: Evidence from the Americas. Global Governance, v. 21, n. 1, p. 19-42, 2015.

GRANATO, Leonardo. Brasil, Argentina e os rumos da integração: o Mercosul e a Unasul. Curitiba: Appris, 2015.

GRIP, Kjell. International marine environmental governance: a review. Ambio, v. 46, n. 4, p. 413–427, 2017.

GUTIERREZ, Dimitri; AKESTER, Michael; NARANJO, Laura. Productivity and sustainable management of the Humboldt Current large marine ecosystem under climate change. Environmental Development, v. 17, p. 126-144, 2016.

JACKSON, Jeremy B.C. et al. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science, v. 293, n. 5530, p. 629-637, 2001.

KEOHANE, Robert O. International institutions: two approaches. International studies quarterly, v. 32, n. 4, p. 379-396, 1988.

McGINNIS, Michael D. An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, v. 39, n. 1, p. 169-183, 2011.

______; OSTRÖM, Elinor. Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, v. 19, n. 2, 2014.

MORRIS, Michael A. (org) North-South perspectives on marine policy. New York: Routledge, 2018.

ORACH, Kirill; SCHLÜTER, Maja. Uncovering the political dimension of social-ecological systems: Contributions from policy process frameworks. Global Environmental Change, v. 40, p. 13-25, 2016.

ORSINI, Amandine; MORIN, Jean-Frédéric; YOUNG, Oran. Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom, or a Bust for Global Governance? Global Governance, v. 19, p. 27, 2013.

OSTRÖM, Elinor. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, v. 325, n.5939, p. 419–22, 2009.

______. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, v.100, n.3, p. 641–72, 2010.

PETERSON, Matilda T.; DELMUTH, Lisa M.; MERRIE, Andrew. Patterns and trends in non-state actor participation in regional fisheries management organizations. Marine Policy, v. 104, pp. 146-155, 2019.

RAUSTIALA, Kal; VICTOR, David G. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization, Spring 2004.

SABINE, Christopher L. et al. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science, v. 305, n. 5682, p. 367-371, 2004.

SCHEFFER, Marten; CARPENTER, Steve; DE YOUNG, Brad. Cascading effects of overfishing marine systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, v. 20, n. 11, p. 579-581, 2005.

STEINER, Andrea Q. A eficácia da Convenção sobre Diversidade Biológica: o caso brasileiro. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Política). Recife: UFPE, 2011.

STEINER, Andrea Q.; MEDEIROS, Marcelo de A. Como saber se as convenções internacionais de meio ambiente realmente funcionam? Abordagens teórico-metodológicas sobre a eficácia dos regimes. Contexto Internacional, v. 32, n. 2, p. 695-727, 2010.

STERN, David I. The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, vol. 32, n. 8, p. 1419-1439, 2004.

UNDERDAL, Arild. The Concept of Regime Effectiveness. Cooperation and Conflict, v. 27, n. 3, p. 227-240, 1992.

VICTOR, David G.; RAUSTIALA, Kal; SKOLNIKOFF, Eugene B. (Ed.). The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: theory and practice. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.

VYLEGZHANIN, Alexander; YOUNG, Oran R.; BERKMAN Paul A. Governing the Barents Sea Region: Current Status, Emerging Issues, and Future Options. Ocean Development & International Law, vol. 49, n. 1, p. 52-78, 2017.

YOUNG, Oran R. Governance in world affairs. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 1999.

WINTERSTEEN, Kristin. A Market-Based Strategy for Improving Environmental Sustainability in the Peruvian Anchoveta Fishery. IN: GALLAGHER, Deborah R. Environmental Leadership: A Reference Handbook. Los Angeles: Sage, 2012.

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Alves, E. E. C., De Albuquerque, R. B., & Steiner, A. Q. (2020). International governance of marine socioecological systems (SES): a case study of South America. Monções: UFGD Journal of International Relations, 9(18), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v9i18.10485

Issue

Section

Articles - Miscellaneous Section