Role Theory as a third way in International Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v8i15.11531Keywords:
Role Theory, National Role Conception, Domestic Role Contestation.Abstract
This paper reflects on Role Theory (RT) and its development in International Relations through a literature review of works published in recent decades. It seeks to analyze the combination of the International Politics (IP) and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) as envisioned through RT. Understanding the process of changing state behavior in different areas requires the consideration of structural, institutional and identity factors of the international system and the domestic environment, and RT seems to be able to unite the different levels of analysis adequately. The confluence of IR and FPA theories through RT is only possible due to particularities of this theory, so understanding how RT dialogues with each of these fields is relevant. Thus, this article will discuss the origins of RT in the humanities and IR, some of its dialogues with other theories, its relationship with the FPA, and its main concepts. RT literature on Brazilian foreign policy will be explored briefly. Another reason for discussing RT’s history and conceptual framework comes from the need to unify concepts exposed in recent RT manuals and articles, which may be useful for future analyses that intend to use RT as a theoretical model. Greater emphasis is given to two concepts: National Role Conception (NRC) and Domestic Role Contestation (DRC). NRC can be defined as policymakers’ perceptions of their nations' position in the international system and are, at least in theory, domestically shared views of what the state's role in the international system should be; they are the basis of Role Theory in IR.
Downloads
References
AGGESTAM, L. (1999) “Role Conceptions and the Politics of Identity in Foreign Policy,” ARENA Working Paper 1999: 8.
AGGESTAM, L. “Role Theory and European Foreign Policy: A Framework of Analysis,” in Elgström, O. and Smith, M. (eds.) The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, London: Routledge. 2006
BIDDLE, J. Bruce. Role Theory: Expectations. Identities and Behaviors, Academic Press, New York 1979.
BREUNING, Marijke. National role conceptions and foreign assistance policy behavior toward a cognitive model, Tese (Doutorado em ciência politica), Ohio, Ohio State University, 1992.
BREUNING, Marijke. (1995) “Words and Deeds: Foreign Assistance Rhetoric and Policy Behavior in the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom,” Political Studies Quarterly, 39: 235–54.
BREUNING, Marijke. “Role Theory Research in International Relations: State of the Art and Blind Spots,” in S. Harnisch, C. Frank, and H. W. Maull (eds.) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses, London: Routledge, 16–35, 2011
BRUMMER, K. and C. G. Thies “The Contested Selection of National Role Conceptions,” Foreign Policy Analysis 11(3): 273–293. 2015
CANTIR, Cristian; KAARBO, Juliet (Ed.). Domestic Role Contestation, Foreign Policy, and International Relations. Routledge, 2016.
______. Contested roles and domestic politics: reflections on role theory in foreign policy analysis and IR theory. Foreign Policy Analysis, v. 8, n. 1, p. 5-24, 2012.
GUIMARÃES, Feliciano de Sá; MAITINO, Martin Egon. Socializing Brazil into Regional Leadership: The 2006 Bolivian Gas Crisis and the Role of Small Powers in Promoting Master Roles Transitions. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2017.
HARNISCH, S. “Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts,” in Harnisch, S., C. Frank, and H. W. Maull (eds.) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses, London: Routledge, 7–15, 2011
HARNISCH, S. “Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning,” Foreign Policy Analysis 8(1): 47–69. 2012
HARNISCH, S. and Friedrichs, G. 2017. Alliances Rebalanced? The Social Meaning of the U.S. Pivot and Allies’ Responses in Northeast Asia. Korean Journal of International Studies, 15(1): 1- 39.
HOLSTI, K. “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy,” International Studies Quarterly, 14(3): 233–309, 1970
HUDSON, V.M. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations”, Foreign Policy Analysis 1(1),1-30, 2005
KAARBO, Juliet. A foreign policy analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR theory. International Studies Review, v. 17, n. 2, p. 189-216, 2015.
KROTZ, U. “National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policies: France and Germany Compared,” Program for the Study of Germany and Europe Working Paper, 02:1, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. 2002
NABERS, D. “Identity and Role Change in International Politics,” in Harnisch, S., C. Frank, and H. W. Maull (eds.) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses, London: Routledge, 74–92, 2011
STOLTE, Christina. Brazil’s Africa strategy: role conception and the drive for international status. New York City: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
TAYFUR, M. F, Main approaches to the study of foreign policy: A review. METU Studies in Development, 21(1), 113-114, 1994
TICKNER, J. A. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era (International Relations Series) New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
THIES, Cameron G, Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. In The International Studies Association Compendium Project, 2009
______ The United States, Israel, and the Search for International Order: Socializing States (Role Theory and International Relations); London: Routledge, 2013
WALKER, S. G., A. Malici, and M. Schafer (eds.) Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis, New York: Routledge, 2011
WALKER, S. G.1987. Role Theory and the Origins of Foreign Policy, In New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy. Edited by Charles F. Hermann, Charles W. Kegley, and James N. Rosenau. 269-284. London: Harper Collins.
WEHNER, L. E., & THIES, C. Role theory, narratives, and interpretation: The domestic contestation of roles. International Studies Review, 16(3), 411-436, 2014
WEHNER, Leslie E. Role expectations as foreign policy: South American secondary powers' expectations of Brazil as a regional power. Foreign Policy Analysis, v. 11, n. 4, p. 435-455, 2015.
______. Inter‐Role Conflict, Role Strain and Role Play in Chile's Relationship with Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research, v. 35, n. 1, p. 64-77, 2016.
WISH, Naomi Bailin. "Foreign Policy Makers and Their National Role Conceptions." International Studies Quarterly 24, no. 4, 1980.
SALOMÓN, Mónica, PINHEIRO, Leticia. Análise de Política Externa Brasileira: trajetória, desafios e possibilidades de um campo de estudos. Revs. Bras. Polít. Inter, Brasília, v. 56 n. 1, p.40-59, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Os autores e autoras mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 3.0 Brasil. que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores e autoras têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores e autoras têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado, porém invariavelmente com o reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
