Movimientos Sociales/Política Mundial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v10i20.15608Palabras clave:
Movimientos sociales, Política mundial, Pensamiento político moderno, Sociedad civil globalResumen
En este artículo central para las perspectivas críticas de las Relaciones Internacionales, Rob Walker discute las posibilidades y los límites que surgen de los intentos de analizar los movimientos sociales en relación con la política mundial. Los movimientos sociales frecuentemente no son considerados importantes para las Relaciones Internacionales y a menudo quedan relegados al ámbito político nacional. Walker destaca el predominio, en el imaginario político moderno, de epistemologías universalizantes y basadas en la trascendencia, por un lado, y fuertemente arraigadas en la experiencia política del Estado soberano moderno, por otro. A través del análisis de un movimiento social indio, el autor señala la pluralidad real y la movilidad de los imaginarios y prácticas políticas existentes en los movimientos sociales de diferentes localidades, enfatizando las epistemologías de la inmanencia que encuentran tensiones con las lecturas tradicionales y universalizantes de cómo los movimientos sociales se relacionan con las dimensiones internacionales de la política. Walker analiza los intentos de incorporar seriamente los movimientos sociales en los análisis de la política mundial, destacando los límites de tales intentos, como la sobregeneralización de las explicaciones estructuralistas y la permanencia de una perspectiva estatista, basada en el ámbito político nacional, en concepciones como las de la sociedad civil global.
Descargas
Citas
ALATAS, S. F. On the Indigenization of Academic Discourse. Alternatives, v. 18, n. 3, pp. 307-338, verão, 1993.
ARRIGHI, G.; HOPKINS, T.; WALLERSTEIN, I. Dilemmas of Antisystemic Movements. Londres: Verso, 1989.
BAUMAN, Z. Modernity and Ambivalence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
BLANEY, D.; INAYATULLAH, N. Prelude to a Conversation of Cultures: Todorov and Nandy on the Possibility of Dialogue. Alternatives, v. 19, n. 1, pp. 23-52, inverno, 1994.
BOOTH, K.; SMITH, S. (eds.). International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
BOURDIEU, P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
BOYLE, C. Imagining the World Market: IPE and the Task of Social Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v.23, n.2, p.351-363, 1994.
BROWN, C. International Political Theory and the Idea of World Community. In: BOOTH, K.; SMITH, S. (eds.). International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 1995. p. 90-109.
BROWN, C. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
BULL, H. (ed.). Intervention in World Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
BULL, H; WATSON, A. (eds.). The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
BUZAN, B. The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations Reconsidered. In: BOOTH, K.; SMITH, S. (eds.). International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 1995. p. 198-216.
CALHOUN, C. (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.
CAMPBELL, D. Political Excess and the Limits of Imagination. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v.23, n.2, p.365-375, 1994.
CARROLL, W. (ed.). Organizing Dissent: Contemporary Social Movements in Theory and Practice. Toronto: Garamond, 1992.
COHEN, J.; ARATO, A. Social Movements and Civil Society. In: COHEN, J.; ARATO, A. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
COLLIER, D. The Comparative Method. In: FITNIFTER, A. (ed.). Political Science: the State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 1993. p. 105-119.
CONNOLLY, W. The Terms of Political Discourse. Oxford: Robertson, 1983.
DARBY, P.; PAOLINI, A. J. Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism. Alternatives, v. 19, n. 3, pp. 371-397, verão, 1994.
FALK, R. On Human Governance: Towards a New Global Politics. Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
FOUCAULT, M. The Order of Things. London: Tavistock, 1970.
FUKUYAMA, F. The End of History and the Last Man. Nova York: Free Press, 1992.
GILL, S. Reflections on Global Order and Sociohistorical Time. Alternatives, v. 16, n. 3, pp. 275-314, verão, 1991.
GILL, S. Structural Change and Global Political Economy: Globalizing Elites and the Emerging World Order. In: SAKAMOTO, Y. (ed.). Global Transformation: Challenges to the State System. Tóquio: United Nations University Press, 1994. p. 169-99.
GILL, S. The Global Panopticon? The Neo-Liberal State, Economic Life and Democratic Surveillance. Alternatives, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 1-49, inverno, 1995.
GOODY, J. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
HABERMAS, J. Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In: CALHOUN, C. (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. pp. 421-461.
HABERMAS, J. The Philosophical Discourses of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.
HABERMAS, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989a.
HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action (vol.1). Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989b.
HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action (vol.2). Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989c.
HACKING, I. Making Up People. In: WELLER, T.; et al. (eds.). Reconstructing Individualism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986. p. 222-236.
HALLIDAY, F. Rethinking International Relations. Londres: Macmillan, 1994a.
HALLIDAY, F. Theory and Ethics in International Relations: the Contradictions of C. Wright Mills. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v.23, n.2, p.377-385, 1994b.
HELD, D. Democracy: From City States to a Cosmopolitan Order. In: HELD, D. (ed.). Problems of Democracy: North, South, East, West. Cambridge: Polity, 1993. p. 13-52.
HELD, D. Sites of Power, Problems of Democracy. Alternatives, v. 19, n. 2, pp. 221-236, primavera, 1994.
HUNTINGTON, S. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, v. 72, n. 3, pp. 22-49, 1993.
LAPID, Y.; KRATOCHWIL, F. (eds.). Rethinking Culture and Identity in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1995.
LASH, S.; URRY, J. Economies of Signs and Space. Londres: Sage, 1994.
LIPSCHUTZ, R. Reconstructing World Politics: The Emergence of Global Civil Society. Millennium, v. 21, n. 3, pp. 389-420, 1992.
MACINTYRE, A. Is a Science of Comparative Politics Possible? In: MACINTYRE, A. Against the Self-Image of the Age, Londres: Duckworth, 1971. p. 260-279.
MAGNUSSON, W. Social Movements and the Global City. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 23, n. 3, pp. 621-645, 1994.
MAQUIAVEL, N. The Prince. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
MELUCCI, A. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989.
MILLS, C. W. The Sociological Imagination. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 1959.
NANDY, A. The Illegitimacy of Nationalism: Rabrindrinath Tagore and the Politics of Self. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994.
NANDY, A. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1993.
NANDY, A. Traditions, Tyranny and Utopias: Essays in the Politics of Awareness. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987.
NARDIN, T.; MAPEL, D. R. (eds.). Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
NEUFELD, M. Who’s Afraid of Meta-Theory? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v.23, n.2, p.387-393, 1994.
NICHOLSON, L. (ed.). Feminism/Postmodernism. Nova York: Routledge, 1990.
ONUF, N. Levels. European Journal of International Relations, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 35-58, 1995.
PALEN, R. P.; GILLS, B. (eds.). Transcending the State-Global Divide. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1994.
RAY, L. J. Rethinking Critical Theory: Emancipation in the Age of Global Social Movements. Londres: Sage, 1993.
RENGGER, N. J. A City Which Sustains All Things? Communitarianism and International Society. Millennium, v. 21, n. 3, pp. 353-370, 1992.
ROSENBERG, J. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Londres: Verso, 1994a.
ROSENBERG, J. The International Imagination”. Millennium, v. 23, n. 1, pp. 85-108, 1994b.
ROSOW, S. J. On the Political Theory of Political Economy: Conceptual Ambiguity and the Global Economy. Review of International Political Economy, v. 1, n. 3, pp. 465-488, outono, 1994.
ROSOW, S. J; INAYATULLAH, N.; RUPERT, M. (eds.). The Global Economy as Political Space. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1994.
ROY, R. Swadhyaya: Values and Message. In: WIGNARAJA, P. (ed.). New Social Movements in the South. Nova Delhi: Vistaar Publications, 1993.
SMITH, S. Rearranging the Deckchairs on the Ship Called Modernity: Rosenberg, Epistemology and Emancipation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v.23, n.2, p.395-405, 1994.
VINCENT, J. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
VINCENT, J. Nonintervention and International Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.
WALKER, R. B. J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
WALKER, R. B. J. International Relations and the Concept of the Political. In: BOOTH, K.; SMITH, S. (eds.). International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 1995. p. 306-327.
WALTZ, K. Man, the State and War. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1959.
WHEELER, N. J. Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium, v. 21, n. 3, pp. 463-488, 1992.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
- Os autores e autoras mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 3.0 Brasil. que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores e autoras têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores e autoras têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado, porém invariavelmente com o reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
