The The Global South and its Perspectives
Expanding the Frontiers of International Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v11i21.16529Keywords:
Global South, Global IR, International Relations TheoryAbstract
This issue of Monções – the special issue The Global South and its Perspectives: expanding the frontiers of International Relations – brings together a set of articles that seek to bring more diversity to the discipline of International Relations from the Global South. Some authors focus on theoretical perspectives still marginalized in the discipline - such as decolonial theory and indigenous perspectives - while others seek to bring innovative conceptual and empirical analyzes based on political experiences in countries of the South. In addition to the articles, the special issue also has an interview with Jaqueline Braveboy-Wagner (City University of New York). In this introductory article, we approach Global IR, pointing out its contributions and limitations, with emphasis on material conditions and their influence on academic production.
Downloads
References
ACHARYA, Amitav. Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 39, n. 3, p. 619–637, 2011.
ACHARYA, Amitav. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly, v. 58, n. 4, p. 647–659, 2014.
ACHARYA, Amitav; BUZAN, Barry. Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, vol. 7, 2007.
ALEJANDRO, Audrey. Western Dominance in International Relations? The Internationalisation of IR in Brazil and India. London and New York: Routledge, 2019.
AMORIM, Celso. Brazilian Foreign Policy under President Lula (2003-2010): an overview. Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. vol. 53, 2010.
ANIEVAS, Alexander; MANCHANDA, Nivi; SHILLIAM, Robbie: Race and Racism in International Relations. New York: Routledge, 2015.
ARIS, Stephen. International vs. area? The disciplinary-politics of knowledge-exchange between IR and Area Studies. International Theory, p. 1–32, 2020. doi:10.1017/S1752971920000184.
AYOOB, MOHAMMED. Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism. International Studies Review, vol. 4, n. 3, 2002.
BALLESTRIN, Luciana M. A. Modernidade/Colonialidade sem “Imperialidade”? O Elo Perdido do Giro Decolonial. DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 60, no 2, 2017.
BALZACQ, Thierry; BEALE, Stéphane J. The Third Debate and Postpositivism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Available at < https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-104>.
BARASUOL, Fernanda; SILVA, André Reis da. International Relations Theory in Brazil: trends and challenges in teaching and research. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 59, 2016.
BEN-DAVID, Joseph; SULLIVAN, Teresa A. Sociology of Science. Annual Review of Sociology 1:1, 1975, 203-222
BIERSTECKER, Thomas. The parochialism of hegemony: Challanges for "American" International Relations. In: Tickner, A. B.; Wæver, O. (Org.). International relations scholarship around the world, Abingdon Oxon, New York: Routledge, 2009.
BILGIN, Pinar. One model of engagement between MES and IR. Washington D.C., 2015.
BILGIN, Pinar. Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?. Third World Quarterly vol. 29, n. 1, 2008.
BUZAN, Berry. The Middle East through English School Theory. In: Buzan, B.; Gonzales-Pelaez, A. (Org.). International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, p. 24–45.
BUZAN, Berry; ACHARYA, Amitav. The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
BUZAN, Berry; LAWSON, George. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
CARDOSO, Fernando Henrique; FALETTO, Enzo. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. México DF: Siglo XXI, 1969.
CERVO, Amado Luiz. Conceitos em Relações Internacionais. Rev. bras. polít. int. vol. 51, n. 2, 2008a.
CERVO, Amado Luiz. Inserção Internacional: formação dos conceitos brasileiros. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva, 2008b.
CIRANI, Cláudia B. S.; CAMPANARIO, Milton; SILVA, Heloisa Helena Marques da. A evolução do ensino da pós-graduação senso estrito no Brasil: análise exploratória e proposições para pesquisa. Avaliação, vol. 20, n. 1, 2015.
DECIANCIO, Melisa. International Relations from the South: A Regional Research Agenda for Global IR. International Studies Review, vol. 18, n. 1, 2016.
ESCUDÉ, Carlos. Realismo periférico. Buenos Aires: Planeta, 1992
FAWCETT, Louise. International Relations and the Middle East: bringing area studies (back) in. Fawcett: Introduction: Does International Relations Need Area Studies? 1. ed., 2020, St Antony's International Review (STAIR), p. 8–14.
GELARDI, Maiken. Moving Global IR Forward - A Road Map. International Studies Review vol. 22: 830-852, 2020.
GILPIN, Robert. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.
HALLIDAY, Fred. Rethinking International Relations. New York: Red Globe Press, 1994.
HELLMANN, Gunther; VALBJORN, Morten (Ed.). Problematizing Global Challenges: Recalibrating the “Inter” in IR-Theory Inter Alia, 2017.
HOLSTI, Kalevi. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1985.
HURRELL, Andrew. Towards the Global Study of International Relations. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 59, n. 2, p. 1–18, 2016. doi:10.1590/0034-7329201600208.
Contributor Introduction: Does International Relations Need Area Studies? 1. ed., 2020 (St Antony's International Review (STAIR), p. 22–28.
KRISTENSEN, Peter Marcus. Revisiting the “American Social Science”- mapping the geography of International Relations.International Studies Perspectives, 2013.
KRISTENSEN, Peter Markus. Rising Powers in the International Relations Discipline: social inquiries into a dividing discipline and the quest for Non-Western Theory. Dissertation submitted to the Department of Political Science of the University of Copenhagen when the author obtained his PhD supervised by OleWæver, 2015.HURRELL, Andrew. Why International Relations and Area Studies need each other.
MILANI, Carlos R. S. The foundation and development of International Relations in Brazil. Review of International Studies, p. 1-17, 2021.
NEUMANN, Stephanie (org). International Relations Theory and the Third World. Nova York: St. Martin's Press, 1998.
QUEJERAZU, Amaya; TICKNER, Arlene. Unsettling Knowledges in Latin America. In. ACHARYA, Amitav; TUSSIE, Diana; DECIANCIO, Melisa. Latin American in Global International Relations. Nova York: Routledge, 2022.
RISSE, Thomas; WEMHEUER-VOGELAAR, Frank Havermann. IR Theory and the Core-Periphery Structure of Global IR: Lessons from Citation Analysis. International Studies Review, Volume 24, Issue 3, September 2022.
SAID, Edward W. Orientalismo: o Oriente como invenção do Ocidente. São Paulo: Companhia de Bolso, 2007.
SARAIVA, José Flávio Sombra (ed.) Concepts, Histories and Theories of International Relations for the 21th Century: Regional and National Approaches. Brasília: IBRI, 2009.
SHAMI, Seteney Khalid; MILLER-IDRISS, Cynthia (Ed.). Middle East studies for the new millennium: Infrastructures of knowledge. New York: New York University Press, 2016. xiii, 488 pages ;. ISBN 9781479827787.
SMITH, Karen. Contrived boundaries, kinship and ubuntu: a (South) African view of “the international”. In. TICKNER, Arlene; BLANEY, David. Thinking International Relations Differently. New York: Routledge.
SOARES, Letícia Alves; ROSA, Marina Almeida. Je Suis Ici, ainda que não queiram”: a inviabilização da mulher negra como docente de Relações Internacionais no Brasil. In. FELIX, Natália M.; BARASUOL, Fernanda; ZANELLA, Cristine. Feminismo, Gênero, e Relações Internacionais.
TICKNER, Arlene. Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. International Studies Perspectives, n. 4, p. 325-350, 2003.
TICKNER, Arlene B. Latin American IR and the Primacy of lo práctico. International Studies Review, vol. 10, n. 4, 2008.
TICKNER, Arlene; WEAVER, Ole. International Relations Scholarship around the World. New York: Routledge, 2009.
TICKNER, Arlene B.; BLANEY, David L. (eds.). Thinking International Relations Differently. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.
TILAK, Jandhyala B. G. Higher education: a public good or a commodity for trade?Commitment to higher education or commitment of higher education to trade. Prospects, vol. 38, 2008.
TURTON, Helen L. International Relations and American Dominance: a diverse discipline. Nova York: Routledge, 2016.
VITALIS, Robert. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. New York: Cornell University Press, 2015.
VUCETIC, S. The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of Racialized Identity in International Relations. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2011.
WEAVER, Ole. The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization, vol. 52, n. 4, 1998.
WEMHEUER-VOGELAAR, Wiebke; BELL, Nicholas J.; MORALES, Mariana Navarrete; and TIERNEY, Michael J. The IR of the Beholder: Examining Global IR Using the 2014 TRIP Survey. International Studies Review 18(1), 2016: 16-32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Os autores e autoras mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 3.0 Brasil. que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores e autoras têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores e autoras têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado, porém invariavelmente com o reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
